Skip to main content

Menstruation Across Cultures, a review


 
One of the least discussed, most neglected and cloaked topics in our cultural discourse is menstruation. Since childhood, we learn to avoid the topic and skirt over it as an embarassment to be dealt with in private. In such a social scenario, 'Menstruation Across Cultures' by scholar Nithin Sridhar is one of the most important books in today's literary circles that should be read by all Indians -- men and women, Hindus and non-Hindus -- so that one of the most basic misconceptions in the Indian psyche can be dispelled. It will make further discourses on a variety of associated social issues like entry to temples like Sabarimala and others by women of menstruating age, more knowledgeable and logical, instead of the biased and theatrical narrative it has become.

 What is inherently wrong with the Indian system of discourse about Hindu practices is that it has been painted over by non-Indic thoughts and practices which were illogical when seen through our cultural and scriptural lens. I don't know why such alien practices seep into our culture so easily. Is it because we are defeated by our own porous, benevolent and non-resisting nature of accepting every other alien thought as ours? The book compares Hindu practices regarding menstruation and women with those of all other major cultures across the world, proving once again that the concept of 'impurity' in Hinduism is entirely different than that of other religions. The definition of impurity in Hindu culture got its negative meaning from other religions and yet, it is Hinduism that got all the blame. The author enunciates with proofs that Abhrahamic religions depict a woman's body and it's functions as sinful, something to be shunned and vilified, whereas Vedic religion celebrates, respects and worships womanhood. Practices such as separation during mentrual period and non-entry to places of worship exist in all major religions and are based on the concept of impurity, the author shows in the book. Most ancient religions including the Greek, Egyptian, Roman and unconnected tribals across the world celebrated menstruation as a positive sacred process asociated with fertility, similar to Hinduism. It is only the modern religions and modern-day misconceptions which consider it as impure. The book also acts as a guide to ayurvedic and yogic practices to lessen the physical problems of women associated with menstruation. The topic has become a taboo in today's Indian society mainly because we, Hindus, have lost the practice of compulsory study of our religion and its associated traditions and are more interested in just what the so-called 'experts' have to say about our own traditions. We believe them and are not bothered to check the veracity of their expertise. And that's where our downfall lies. To save our culture, the only way ahead is to study books like this and understand for ourselves what our traditions mean in their actual context.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Caterpillar or butterfly?

'Caught in a strange land in a net with other butterflies, I'm a caterpillar yet undecided to remain a caterpillar and perish or turn into a beautiful butterfly and live a life full of joy.' Readers don't laugh. But I came up with this one night recently when I was travelling in a train. I tossed and turned, not being able to sleep, upset over unexplainable things and frustrated over events not in my control. Then it occurred to me that our life and its usefulness depends on our decisions -- whether to remain a crawling caterpillar whose existence otherwise is either ignored by all and sundry or who is cursed for just being there and thrown out with a stick, or to develop wings of life and metamorphose into a beautiful butterfly whom everybody adores for its beauty and colour, for its flitting liveliness, for its service to the flower's pollination... I thought that I should be a butterfly, of service to others, but then again I thought, anyway, who really cares? 

A listener

I have always been a listener. And we can listen only when we are silent. Since childhood, silence was my way of life. It is the only way one can understand the psyche of others.  I also listened to myself. It encouraged me to think. And when I began thinking, this world began to reveal itself. And when I started understanding people, I also realised the only way forward is to again remain silent. Silence in either way keeps me calm, peaceful. I feel like a detached onlooker. 

Two separate questions

Guess I am out of touch with everything right now, so no blog entry for many days. From many days, a question is bothering me. I haven't found a satisfactory answer yet. So I'll write it down here. Maybe anybody who reads this may know the answer. "Just because we are journalists, writers, opinion creators and thinkers, do we have the right to judge others? Either personally or professionally?" I think we don't have the right to judge a person, even if we are right. But as writers, we would have to judge others whether we like it or not. And it's very difficult forcing people to think, but that's what we are doing or pretending to be doing right? Another question: "How come life is so simple if you just let it live by itself without bothering much and so complicated if you try to manipulate it or even understand it?" Blessed are the ignorant. We who can understand everything, try not to let anything go by without understanding and thus miss the b...